RESUMO
Primary prevention is the cornerstone of public health. Prevention is especially important for chronic diseases of significant burden such as mental illnesses because many of them have limited treatment options, an onset in childhood or in adolescence, and are linked to adverse childhood experiences requiring a focus on early childhood and maternal-child health (MCH). Despite this need, there appears to be a paucity of research into prevention of mental illnesses within public health. To confirm this, we performed a systematic literature review to quantify the proportion of articles in public health that focus on prevention of mental illness versus intervention for these illnesses after their onset, and the proportion of published articles within MCH that focus on mental health. Between November 2019 and August 2021, we reviewed 211,794 published articles from 147 Scimago-ranked English public health journals with no limit on year of publication. As hypothesized, a very small portion (2.2%) of mental health articles included primary prevention and a small portion of MCH articles (7.8%) included mental health. These results are consistent with the existence of a research gap in mental illness prevention within the public health field. Given the early onset of mental illness, the importance of early childhood experiences in the later development of mental illness, and the importance of the social-emotional connection between mother and child for building resilience, public health professionals must incorporate evidence from the field of MCH to develop and assess more primary prevention programs for mental illness.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary protocol for management of patients with papilledema and vision loss secondary to increased intracranial pressure. METHODS: Retrospective record review of all adult patients who presented with vision-threatening papilledema (VTPE) and were treated under this protocol. Patients are admitted for lumbar drain placement and diuretics and followed daily to determine if they may be managed medically or require surgery (optic nerve sheath fenestration [ONSF] and/or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] shunting). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Twelve had body mass index in the obese range and 6 were morbidly obese. Fourteen had idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Five had secondary pseudotumor cerebri syndrome related to medication use, dural venous sinus thrombosis, hypothyroidism, end-stage renal disease, pulmonary disease, and diastolic heart failure. Three patients did not require surgery and were discharged on oral diuretics; 3 patients underwent unilateral ONSF, 9 underwent bilateral ONSF, and 4 underwent bilateral ONSF followed by ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. The average follow-up was 10.1 months. The visual acuity improved bilaterally in 12 patients and unilaterally in 4 patients. The remaining 3 patients had worsened vision in both eyes. Fifteen patients had bilateral improvement in their visual fields. Five eyes in 3 patients showed further constriction of the visual field at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate how a multidisciplinary complex care protocol for treating VTPE can expedite and streamline treatment and restore vision. We found that most patients had improved symptoms and signs, including visual acuity, visual fields, and papilledema. We encourage institutions that manage VTPE to adopt similar institutional protocols.
